it is said that the Singapore has set the global pace for
student-centered learning with a 2:1 (2 pupils with one computer) ratio in its
masterplan for IT in Education. This shows that even in other progressive
countries, the 1:1: pupil-computer ratio is still an ideal to be achieved.
Reality therefore dictates that schools face the fact that each classroom,
especially in public or government schools, may not be equipped with the
appropriate number of computers.
The creativity of the teacher will
have to respond to the situation, and so cooperative learning will likely be
the answer to the implementation of IT supported learning in our schools. But
the situation may not be that bad since there are motivational and social
benefits to cooperative learning and these can compensate for lack of hardware
that educators face.
Defining cooperative learning
Cooperative or collaborative
learning is learning by small groups of students who work together in a common
learning task. It is often also called group learning but to be truly
cooperative learning, 5 elements are needed:
1. A common goal
2.
Interdependence
3. Interaction
4. Individual
accountability
5. Social skills
Therefore not every group work is
cooperative learning since students working on their work sheets physically sat
around a table may be working together without these features of cooperative
learning.
From several
studies made on cooperative learning, it is manifested that cooperative
learning in its true sense is advantageous since it:
(a) Encourage
active learning, while motivating students
(b) Increases
academic performance
(c) Promotes
literacy and language skills
(d) Improves
teacher effectiveness
In addition, there are studies show
that cooperative learning enhances personal and social development among
students of all ages, while enhancing self-esteem and improving social
relations between racially and culturally different students.
Cooperative
learning and the computer
Researchers have made studies on the
learning interaction between the student and the computer. The studies have
great value since it has been a long standing fear that the computer may foster
student learning in isolation that hinders the development of the student’s
social skills.
Now this mythical fear has been
contradicted by the studies which show that when students work with computers
in groups, they cluster and interact with each other for advice and mutual
help. And given the option to work individually or in a group, the students
generally wish to work together in computer-based and non-computer-based
activities. Reflecting on this phenomenon, psychologists think the computer
fosters this positive social behavior due to the fact that it has a display
monitor – just like a television set – that is looked upon as something
communal.
Therefore researchers agree that
the computer is a fairly natural learning vehicle for cooperative (at times
called promotive) learning.
Components of
cooperative learning
Educators are still wary about the
computer’s role in cooperative learning. Thus they pose the position that the
use of computers do not automatically result in cooperative learning. There
therefore assign the teacher several tasks in order to ensure collaborative
learning. These are:
· Assigning
students to mixed-ability teams
· Establishing
positive interdependence
· Teaching
cooperative social skills
· Insuring
individual accountability, and
· Helping groups
process information
These are in addition to assigning a
common work goal in which each member of the group will realize that their
group will not succeed unless everyone contributes to the groups’ success. It is
also important for the teacher limits learning group clusters (six is the ideal
number in a group) so there can be closer involvement in thinking and learning.
As an application to this, the following are given as a sort of learning.
Discuss the difference between peer
competition and positive interdependence in a group. Simply said, aren’t there
debates in group work?
ü Peer
competition is the learning that happens with peers. They exchange ideas with
each other. Confidence in peer competition is more exercised. In positive
interdependence, there is learning within the group. Others may be shy and
others may be confident enough to share their ideas.
2. What can be done in case some members of a
group do not show positive interpersonal and communication skills? Can the
teacher help in this situation?
ü There are
persons who are too shy to express what they want and share what they know. The
teacher may help by letting them contribute one by one so that they can
overcome their shyness.
3. Do skills in listening, negotiating,
compromising, punctuality, tolerance (giving others a chance to speak) part of
the social skills needed in group work?
ü These things
are probably the most important things in a group work. It can surely help to let
the students enjoy peace while learning.
4. How can group members ensure that each
member of the group is also accountable for the group work, and not totally
depended on others? In practical terms, how can the teacher grade individual
students fairly in a group activity for one single output?
ü The
participation of everyone in the group must be strictly observed for the
teacher to know how he/she gives grade to each and to be fair for those who
actively and willingly contribute to the topic. One from the group may be
obligated to list all the names of contributors to each topic they take.
5. While cooperative learning is a very good
avenue for teachers to help students learn effectively, why is it not to be
adopted in all classroom learning situations?
ü Cooperative
learning should be applied often but the teacher should also have the time to
discuss so that students may also learn from the teacher and not just only from
the group.